Assault fresh luke mark matthew problem redating synoptic
Those traditions pre-date the final written Gospels by decades and consist of eyewitness testimony.1 And while my recollection of the specific wording of graffiti forty years ago – something I wasn’t particularly interested in at the time – is likely to be pretty bad, my recollection of important events that were striking to me at the time and have been important to me ever since (for example, who was the woman in white at my wedding, and what did she say when the minister asked her if she takes me as her husband? So nothing important stands or falls on the question of whether or not a Gospel was written in the 50s, 60s or 80s.
Still, it’s nice – fun in a wicked sort of way actually – to be able to show that a Gospel was written early. Robinson was hardly an outspoken conservative, and he wrote during a time when liberal New Testament criticism ruled the roost in academia.
Critics of the reliability of the Gospels like to think of their authorship being as late as possible in order to increase the distance between the account and the alleged event, strengthening the narrative according to which the Gospels consist of legends that sprang up during the intervening decades. Robinson contended that the proverbial emperor had no clothes and that the widely accepted view that the New Testament books were composed late was a theory without foundations.
I’ll try to be brief, but I must make a detour into the question of the authorship, as it is related to the issue of dating.
” (the NRSV from which I quoted often alters the sentence to remove reference to gender). This is from the Gospel of Luke (10:7), where Jesus is giving his disciples instructions before sending them out.
So how did Paul know about this saying being in Scripture?
As far as I can tell, St Paul quoted from the written Gospel of Luke.
And since St Paul died in AD 67 or thereabouts, the Gospel of Luke must be younger than that.